Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.352
Filtrar
1.
Am J Prev Med ; 66(5): 894-898, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38143044

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Violence is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among U.S. youth. More information on the health and economic burden of the most frequent assault mechanisms-or, causes (e.g., firearms, cut/pierce)-can support the development and implementation of effective public health strategies. Using nationally representative data sources, this study estimated the annual health and economic burden of U.S. youth violence by injury mechanism. METHODS: In 2023, CDC's WISQARS provided the number of homicides and nonfatal assault ED visits by injury mechanism among U.S. youth aged 10-24 years in 2020, as well as the associated average economic costs of medical care, lost work, morbidity-related reduced quality of life, and value of statistical life. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Sample provided supplemental nonfatal assault incidence data for comprehensive reporting by injury mechanism. RESULTS: Of the $86B estimated annual economic burden of youth homicide, $78B was caused by firearms, $4B by cut/pierce injuries, and $1B by unspecified causes. Of the $36B billion estimated economic burden of nonfatal youth violence injuries, $19B was caused by struck by/against injuries, $3B by firearm injuries, and $365M by cut/pierce injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The lethality of assault injuries affecting youth when a weapon is explicitly or likely involved is high-firearms and cut/pierce injuries combined account for nearly all youth homicides compared to one-tenth of nonfatal assault injury ED visits. There are numerous evidence-based policies, programs, and practices to reduce the number of lives lost or negatively impacted by youth violence.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Violencia , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Adolescente , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Adulto Joven , Femenino , Masculino , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida , Costo de Enfermedad
2.
JAMA Intern Med ; 183(3): 203-211, 2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36715993

RESUMEN

Importance: Prehospital point-of-care troponin testing and paramedic risk stratification might improve the efficiency of chest pain care pathways compared with existing processes with equivalent health outcomes, but the association with health care costs is unclear. Objective: To analyze whether prehospital point-of-care troponin testing and paramedic risk stratification could result in cost savings compared with existing chest pain care pathways. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this economic evaluation of adults with acute chest pain without ST-segment elevation, cost-minimization analysis was used to assess linked ambulance, emergency, and hospital attendance in the state of Victoria, Australia, between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019. Interventions: Paramedic risk stratification and point-of-care troponin testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was estimated mean annualized statewide costs for acute chest pain. Between May 17 and June 25, 2022, decision tree models were developed to estimate costs under 3 pathways: (1) existing care, (2) paramedic risk stratification and point-of-care troponin testing without prehospital discharge, or (3) prehospital discharge and referral to a virtual emergency department (ED) for low-risk patients. Probabilities for the prehospital pathways were derived from a review of the literature. Multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 50 000 Monte Carlo iterations was used to estimate mean costs and cost differences among pathways. Results: A total of 188 551 patients attended by ambulance for chest pain (mean [SD] age, 61.9 [18.3] years; 50.5% female; 49.5% male; Indigenous Australian, 2.0%) were included in the model. Estimated annualized infrastructure and staffing costs for the point-of-care troponin pathways, assuming a 5-year device life span, was $2.27 million for the pathway without prehospital discharge and $4.60 million for the pathway with prehospital discharge (incorporating virtual ED costs). In the decision tree model, total annual cost using prehospital point-of-care troponin and paramedic risk stratification was lower compared with existing care both without prehospital discharge (cost savings, $6.45 million; 95% uncertainty interval [UI], $0.59-$16.52 million; lower in 94.1% of iterations) and with prehospital discharge (cost savings, $42.84 million; 95% UI, $19.35-$72.26 million; lower in 100% of iterations). Conclusions and Relevance: Prehospital point-of-care troponin and paramedic risk stratification for patients with acute chest pain could result in substantial cost savings. These findings should be considered by policy makers in decisions surrounding the potential utility of prehospital chest pain risk stratification and point-of-care troponin models provided that safety is confirmed in prospective studies.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Troponina , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Paramédico , Estudios Prospectivos , Manejo del Dolor , Australia , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio
3.
J Nutr Health Aging ; 26(8): 786-791, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35934823

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition or its risk affects up to 70% of cancer patients. Compared to adequately nourished oncology patients, those with malnutrition experience more complications and have poorer prognoses, thus higher needs for healthcare. We compared utilization of emergency department (ED) services and costs for Medicare-covered cancer patients with or without a malnutrition diagnosis. METHODS: We used the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Standard Analytic File to identify fee-for-service beneficiaries who had a cancer diagnosis, and had one or more outpatient claims in 2018. We totaled individual claims and costs for ED visits per beneficiary, then calculated mean per-person claims and costs for malnourished vs non-malnourished patients. RESULTS: Using data from over 2.8 million claims of patients with cancer diagnoses, the prevalence of diagnosed malnutrition was 2.5%. The most common cancer types were genitourinary, hematologic/blood, and breast. Cancer patients with a malnutrition diagnosis, compared to those without, had a significantly higher annual total number of outpatient claims (21.4 vs. 11.5, P<.0001), including a 2.5-fold higher rate of ED visits (1.43 vs. 0.56, p<.0001). As result, such patients incurred more than 2-fold higher mean ED claim costs than did their adequately nourished counterparts ($10,724 vs. $4,935, P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that malnutrition in cancer patients imposes a high outpatient burden on resource utilization and costs of care in terms of ED use. We propose that nutritional interventions can be used to improve health outcomes for people with cancer and to improve economic outcomes for patients and providers.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Desnutrición , Neoplasias , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Medicare/economía , Neoplasias/terapia , Estados Unidos
4.
Am Surg ; 88(8): 1783-1791, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35377258

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Older adults (OAs; ≥ 65 years) comprise a growing population in the United States and are anticipated to require an increasing number of emergency general surgery procedures (EGSPs). The aims of this study were to identify the frequency of EGSPs and compare cost of care in OAs managed at teaching hospitals (THs) vs nonteaching hospitals (NTHs). METHODS: A retrospective review of data from the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database from 2009 to 2018 for OAs undergoing EGSPs was undertaken. Data collected included demographics, all patient-refined (APR)-severity of illness (SOI), APR-risk of mortality (ROM), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), EGSPs (partial colectomy (PC), small bowel resection, cholecystectomy, operative management of peptic ulcers, lysis of adhesions, appendectomy, and laparotomy, categorized hospital charges, length of stay (LOS), and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 55,401 OAs undergoing EGSPs in this study, 28,575 (51.6%) were treated at THs and 26,826 (48.4%) at NTHs. OAs at THs presented with greater APR-ROM (major 25.6% vs 24.9%, extreme 22.6% vs 22.0%, P=.01), and CCI (3.1±3 vs 2.7±2.8, P<.001) compared to NTHs. Lysis of adhesions, cholecystectomy, and PC comprised the overall most common EGSPs. Older adults at THs incurred comparatively higher median hospital charges for every EGSP due to increased room charges and LOS. Mortality was higher at THs (6.13% vs 5.33%, P<.001). CONCLUSION: While acuity of illness appears similar, cost of undergoing EGSPs for OAs is higher in THs vs NTHs due to increased LOS. Future work is warranted to determine and mitigate factors that increase LOS at THs.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Costos de Hospital , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Enseñanza/economía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Maryland , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/economía
5.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0262646, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35041721

RESUMEN

In the paper the costs of Polish county hospitals in 2015-2018 are studied using behavioral cost function. The set of variables combines hospitals' characteristics which may determine their level of costs, such as the form of ownership, bed turnover rate, number of patient-days and share of beds in emergency department with environment characteristics which may influence both outsourcing costs and patients' health. In 2017 the system of basic hospital service provision (hospital network) was introduced in Poland. Dummy variables included in the model represent the category of hospital in the system. The results show that the costs may be described using fixed effect panel model. Positive impact of percentage of emergency department patients transferred to other departments and of wages is found. Higher ratio of residents and interns to doctors is found to decrease costs. Dummy variable for the period after the introduction of hospital network assumed a negative sign with costs, but the parameter remained insignificant.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Costos de Hospital/organización & administración , Hospitales de Condado/economía , Propiedad/economía , Salarios y Beneficios/economía , Humanos , Polonia
6.
Ann Emerg Med ; 79(3): 279-287, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34839942

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in trauma-related pediatric emergency department (ED) visits and management in US children's hospitals over 10 years. METHODS: This is a retrospective, descriptive study of the Pediatric Health Information Systems database, including encounters from 33 US children's hospitals. We included patients aged 0 to 19 years with traumatic injuries from 2010 to 2019 identified using International Classification of Diseases-9 and -10 codes. The primary outcome was prevalence of trauma-related ED visits. The secondary outcomes included ED disposition, advanced imaging use, and trauma care costs. We examined trends over time with Poisson regression models, reporting incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We compared demographic groups with rate differences with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Trauma-related visits accounted for 367,072 ED visits (16.3%) in 2010 and 479,458 ED visits (18.1%) in 2019 (IRR 1.022, 95% CI 1.018 to 1.026). From 2010 to 2019, 54.6% of children with traumatic injuries belonged to White race and 23.9% had Hispanic ethnicity. Institutional hospitalization rates (range 3.8% to 14.9%) decreased over time (IRR 0.986, 95% CI 0.977 to 0.994). Hospitalizations from 2010 to 2019 were higher in White children (8.9%) than in children of other races (6.4%) (rate difference 2.56, 95% CI 2.51 to 2.61). Magnetic resonance imaging for brain (IRR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.07) and cervical spine (IRR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.05) evaluation increased. The total trauma care costs were $6.7 billion, with median costs decreasing over time. CONCLUSION: During the study period, pediatric ED visits for traumatic injuries increased, whereas hospitalizations decreased. Some advanced imaging use increased; however, median trauma costs decreased over time.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas y Lesiones/economía , Heridas y Lesiones/etiología , Adulto Joven
7.
J Autism Dev Disord ; 52(4): 1587-1597, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33966133

RESUMEN

Using the 2008-2013 Medicaid Analytic eXtract files, this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the effect of Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) waiver programs on emergency department (ED) utilizations among youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Our study showed that the annual ED utilization rates were 13.5% and 18.8% for individuals on autism specific and intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) waivers respectively, vs. 28.5% for those without a waiver. Multivariable logistic regression showed that, compared to no waiver, autism specific waivers (adjusted odds ratio: 0.62; 95% Confidence Interval: [0.58-0.66]) and IDD waivers (0.65; [0.64-0.66]) were strongly associated with reduced ED. These findings suggest that HCBS waivers are effective in reducing the incidence of ED visits among youth with ASD.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Medicaid , Adolescente , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/economía , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/epidemiología , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/terapia , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/economía , Humanos , Discapacidad Intelectual/economía , Discapacidad Intelectual/epidemiología , Discapacidad Intelectual/terapia , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 56(7): 576-583, 2022 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34319947

RESUMEN

GOALS: The aim was to investigate the impact of night-time emergency department (ED) presentation on outcomes of patients admitted for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH). BACKGROUND: The relationship between time of ED presentation and outcomes of gastrointestinal hemorrhage is unclear. STUDY: Using the 2016 and 2017 Florida State Inpatient Databases which provide times of ED arrival, we identified and categorized adults hospitalized for UGIH to daytime (07:00 to 18:59 h) and night-time (19:00 to 06:59 h) based on the time of ED presentation. We matched both groups with propensity scores, and assessed their clinical outcomes including all-cause in-hospital mortality, in-hospital endoscopy utilization, length of stay (LOS), total hospitalization costs, and 30-day all-cause readmission rates. RESULTS: Of the identified 38,114 patients with UGIH, 89.4% (n=34,068) had acute nonvariceal hemorrhage (ANVH), while 10.6% (n=4046) had acute variceal hemorrhage (AVH). Compared with daytime patients, ANVH patients admitted at night-time had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 1.32; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.60), lower odds of in-patient endoscopy (odds ratio: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.90), higher total hospital costs ($9911 vs. $9545, P <0.016), but similar LOS and readmission rates. Night-time AVH patients had a shorter LOS (5.4 vs. 5.8 d, P =0.045) but similar mortality rates, endoscopic utilization, total hospitalization costs, and readmission rates as daytime patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients arriving in the ED at night-time with ANVH had worse outcomes (mortality, hospitalization costs, and endoscopy utilization) compared with daytime patients. However, those with AVH had comparable outcomes irrespective of ED arrival time.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/estadística & datos numéricos , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/complicaciones , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/terapia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0261303, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34919596

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine whether redeploying junior doctors to assist at triage represents good value for money and a good use of finite staffing resources. METHODS: We undertook a cost-minimisation analysis to produce new evidence, from an economic perspective, about the costs associated with reallocating junior doctors in the emergency department. We built a decision-analytic model, using a mix of prospectively collected data, routinely collected administrative databases and hospital costings to furnish the model. To measure the impact of uncertainty on the model's inputs and outputs, probabilistic sensitivity analysis was undertaken, using Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: The mean costs for usual care were $27,035 (95% CI $27,016 to $27,054), while the mean costs for the new model of care were $25,474, (95% CI $25,453 to $25,494). As a result, the mean difference was -$1,561 (95% CI -$1,533 to -$1,588), with the new model of care being a less costly approach to managing staffing allocations, in comparison to the usual approach. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that redeploying a junior doctor from the fast-track area of the department to assist at triage provides a modest reduction in cost. Our findings give decision-makers who seek to maximise benefit from their finite budget, support to reallocate personnel within the ED.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/economía , Personal de Enfermería/economía , Triaje/economía , Recursos Humanos/economía , Simulación por Computador , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Triaje/normas
10.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0260809, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34855892

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine 1-year attributable healthcare costs of bronchiolitis. METHODS: Using a population-based matched cohort and incidence-based cost analysis approach, we identified infants <12 months old diagnosed in an emergency department (ED) or hospitalized with bronchiolitis between April 1, 2003 and March 31, 2014. We propensity-score matched infants with and without bronchiolitis on sex, age, income quintile, rurality, co-morbidities, gestational weeks, small-for-gestational-age status and pre-index healthcare cost deciles. We calculated mean attributable 1-year costs using a generalized estimating equation model and stratified costs by age, sex, income quintile, rurality, co-morbidities and prematurity. RESULTS: We identified 58,375 infants with bronchiolitis (mean age 154±95 days, 61.3% males, 4.2% with comorbidities). Total 1-year mean bronchiolitis-attributable costs were $4,313 per patient (95%CI: $4,148-4,477), with $2,847 (95%CI: $2,712-2,982) spent on hospitalizations, $610 (95%CI: $594-627) on physician services, $562 (95%CI: $556-567)] on ED visits, $259 (95%CI: $222-297) on other healthcare costs and $35 ($27-42) on drugs. Attributable bronchiolitis costs were $2,765 (95%CI: $2735-2,794) vs $111 (95%CI: $102-121) in the initial 10 days post index date, $4,695 (95%CI: $4,589-4,800) vs $910 (95%CI: $847-973) in the initial 180 days and $1,158 (95%CI: $1,104-1213) vs $639 (95%CI: $599-679) during days 181-360. Mean 1-year bronchiolitis costs were higher in infants <3 months old [$5,536 (95%CI: $5,216-5,856)], those with co-morbidities [$17,530 (95%CI: $14,683-20,377)] and with low birthweight [$5,509 (95%CI: $4,927-6,091)]. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to no bronchiolitis, bronchiolitis incurs five-time and two-time higher healthcare costs within the initial and subsequent six-months, respectively. Most expenses occur in the initial 10 days and relate to hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Bronquiolitis/epidemiología , Bronquiolitis/patología , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino
11.
Am J Emerg Med ; 50: 773-777, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34698640

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: While the role of palliative care in the emergency department is recognized, barriers against the effective integration of palliative interventions and emergency care remain. We examined the association between goals-of-care and palliative care consultations and healthcare utilization outcomes in older adult patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with sepsis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 197 patients aged 65 years and older who presented to the ED with sepsis or septic shock. Healthcare utilization outcomes were compared between patients divided into 3 groups: no palliative care consultation, palliative care consultation within 4 days of admission (i.e., early consultation), and palliative care consultation after 4 days of admission (i.e., late consultation). RESULTS: 51% of patients did not receive any palliative consultation, 39% of patients underwent an early palliative care consultation (within 4 days), and 10% of patients underwent a late palliative care consultation (after 4 days). Patients who received late palliative care consultation had a significantly increased number of procedures, total length of stay, ICU length of stay, and cost (p < .01, p < .001, p < .05, p < .001; respectively). Regarding early palliative care consultation, there were no statistically significant associations between this intervention and our outcomes of interest; however, we noted a trend towards decreased total length of stay and decreased healthcare cost. CONCLUSION: In patients aged 65 years and older who presented to the ED with sepsis, early palliative consultations were associated with reduced healthcare utilization as compared to late palliative consultations.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/organización & administración , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Sepsis/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/economía , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Mid-Atlantic Region , Cuidados Paliativos/economía , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
12.
PLoS One ; 16(10): e0257796, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34705847

RESUMEN

Sickle cell disease is a progressively debilitating genetic condition that affects red blood cells and can result in a variety of serious medical complications, reduced life expectancy, and diminished quality of life. Medicaid nationwide covered 66 percent of sickle cell disease hospitalizations in 2004 and 58 percent of emergency department visits for the disease between 1999 and 2007. Using Medicaid data from four states with large populations that account for more than one-third of Medicaid program enrollment, we examined the characteristics of those with sickle cell disease. We found instances of mortality rates more than nine times the age-adjusted population average (in Texas, a mortality rate for Medicaid enrollees with SCD of 1.11 percent compared to 0.12 percent overall); rates of disability-related eligibility-which is associated with long-term Medicaid enrollment-of up to 69 percent; and half or more of affected enrollees having (all-cause) hospital stays, emergency department visits, and opioid prescription fills. With gene therapies on the horizon that will spur discussions of treatment coverage, costs, and outcomes for people with sickle cell disease, it is important for relevant stakeholders to understand the affected populations.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Anemia de Células Falciformes/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Medicaid/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/economía , Anemia de Células Falciformes/economía , Anemia de Células Falciformes/terapia , Personas con Discapacidad , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Prescripciones/economía , Calidad de Vida , Texas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
PLoS One ; 16(10): e0258182, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34705854

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Healthcare spending in the emergency department (ED) setting has received intense focus from policymakers in the United States (U.S.). Relatively few studies have systematically evaluated ED spending over time or disaggregated ED spending by policy-relevant groups, including health condition, age, sex, and payer to inform these discussions. This study's objective is to estimate ED spending trends in the U.S. from 2006 to 2016, by age, sex, payer, and across 154 health conditions and assess ED spending per visit over time. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This observational study utilized the National Emergency Department Sample, a nationally representative sample of hospital-based ED visits in the U.S. to measure healthcare spending for ED care. All spending estimates were adjusted for inflation and presented in 2016 U.S. Dollars. Overall ED spending was $79.2 billion (CI, $79.2 billion-$79.2 billion) in 2006 and grew to $136.6 billion (CI, $136.6 billion-$136.6 billion) in 2016, representing a population-adjusted annualized rate of change of 4.4% (CI, 4.4%-4.5%) as compared to total healthcare spending (1.4% [CI, 1.4%-1.4%]) during that same ten-year period. The percentage of U.S. health spending attributable to the ED has increased from 3.9% (CI, 3.9%-3.9%) in 2006 to 5.0% (CI, 5.0%-5.0%) in 2016. Nearly equal parts of ED spending in 2016 was paid by private payers (49.3% [CI, 49.3%-49.3%]) and public payers (46.9% [CI, 46.9%-46.9%]), with the remainder attributable to out-of-pocket spending (3.9% [CI, 3.9%-3.9%]). In terms of key groups, the majority of ED spending was allocated among females (versus males) and treat-and-release patients (versus those hospitalized); those between age 20-44 accounted for a plurality of ED spending. Road injuries, falls, and urinary diseases witnessed the highest levels of ED spending, accounting for 14.1% (CI, 13.1%-15.1%) of total ED spending in 2016. ED spending per visit also increased over time from $660.0 (CI, $655.1-$665.2) in 2006 to $943.2 (CI, $934.3-$951.6) in 2016, or at an annualized rate of 3.4% (CI, 3.3%-3.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Though ED spending accounts for a relatively small portion of total health system spending in the U.S., ED spending is sizable and growing. Understanding which diseases are driving this spending is helpful for informing value-based reforms that can impact overall health care costs.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
15.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(34): e27066, 2021 Aug 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34449502

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: There has been a historic separation between systems that address behavioral health problems and the medical care system that addresses other health issues. Integration of the 2 has the potential to improve care.The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Integrated Behavioral Health program on health care utilization and costs.Claims data between 2015 and 2018 from Rhode Island's All Payers Claims Database representing 42,936 continuously enrolled unique patients.Retrospective study based on propensity score-matched difference-in-differences framework.Utilization (emergency department visits, office visits, and hospitalizations) and costs (total, inpatient, outpatient, professional, and pharmacy).Integrated Behavioral Health intervention in Rhode Island was associated with reduction in healthcare utilization. Emergency department visits reduced by 6.4 per 1000 people per month and office visits reduced by 29.8 per 1000 people per month, corresponding to a reduction of 7% and 6%, respectively. No statistically significant association was observed between the intervention and hospitalizations. The evidence was mixed for cost outcomes, with negative association recorded between the intervention and the likelihood of incurring non-zero cost but no significant association was observed between the intervention and the level of costs. This relationship held true for most of the cost measures considered.Integrated Behavioral Health intervention in Rhode Island was associated with significant reductions in emergency department visits and office visits, with no effects on hospitalizations. In terms of the cost outcomes, we found evidence that the intervention negatively affected the likelihood of incurring any non-zero costs but did not affect the level of costs.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Integración de Sistemas , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/organización & administración , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Visita a Consultorio Médico , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rhode Island , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia
16.
Health Serv Res ; 56(5): 953-961, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34350589

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare approaches to estimating the service delivery cost of emergency department (ED) visits from total charge data only. DATA SOURCES: The 2013-2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Healthcare Cost Report Information System (HCRIS) public use files. STUDY DESIGN: Compare a baseline approach (requiring cost-center-level charge detail) and four alternative methods (relying on total charges only) for estimating ED visit costs. Estimation errors are calculated after applying each method to a sample of ED visits, treating estimates from the baseline approach as the "true" cost. Performance metrics are calculated at the visit and hospital levels. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The charges, revenue center codes, and patient/hospital characteristics were extracted from the SEDD. Detailed costs and charges were extracted from HCRIS public use files. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Baseline ("true") ED visit costs increased from $383 to $420 per visit between 2013 and 2017. Three methods performed comparatively well estimating mean cost per visit. The method using an overall cost-to-charge ratio (CCR) for all ancillary cost centers without regression adjustment (ANC-CCR) performed the worst, overestimating "true" costs by $63-$113 per visit. The other three methods, which used CCRs computed from selected cost centers, exhibited much smaller bias, with two of the methods yielding estimates within $2 of the "true" cost in 2017. Compared with ANC-CCR, the other three methods had more compact estimation error distributions. The estimated mean visit costs from all four methods have relatively small statistical variance, with 95% confidence intervals for mean cost in a hospital with 25,000 ED visits ranging between $4 and $7. CONCLUSIONS: When cost-center-level charge detail for ED visits is unavailable, alternative methods relying on total ED charges can estimate ED service costs for patient and hospital segments.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Humanos , Modelos Económicos , Proyectos de Investigación , Estados Unidos
17.
PLoS One ; 16(8): e0256267, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34403449

RESUMEN

Local hospitals play a crucial role in the healthcare system. In this study, the efficiency of Polish county hospitals is assessed by considering characteristics of hospitals that may determine their performance, such as the form of ownership, size, and staff structure. The main goal was to analyze the effect of three possible determinants on efficiency: ownership, the presence of an Emergency Department, and the presence of an Intensive Care Unit. The study covered different subgroups of hospitals and different approaches of inputs and outputs. An input-oriented radial super-efficiency DEA model under variable returns to scale was used for the efficiency analysis, and then differences between distributions of efficient and inefficient units were evaluated using a Chi-square test. A Kruskal-Wallis test was also used to analyze differences in mean efficiency. Inefficiency scores were regressed with hospital characteristics to test for other determinants. These results did not confirm differences in efficiency concerning ownership. However, in some subgroups of hospitals, running an Emergency Department or an Intensive Care Unit had a significant effect. Tobit regression results provided additional insight into how an Emergency Department or Intensive Care Unit can affect efficiency. Both cases had an effect of increasing inefficiency, and the data suggested that the department/unit size plays an important role.


Asunto(s)
Eficiencia Organizacional/economía , Hospitales de Condado/economía , Hospitales Privados/economía , Hospitales Públicos/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/provisión & distribución , Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Polonia , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
18.
Urology ; 157: 107-113, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34391774

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize full cycle of care costs for managing an acute ureteral stone using time-driven activity-based costing. METHODS: We defined all phases of care for patients presenting with an acute ureteral stone and built an overarching process map. Maps for sub-processes were constructed through interviews with providers and direct observation of clinical spaces. This facilitated calculation of cost per minute for all aspects of care delivery, which were multiplied by associated process times. These were added to consumable costs to determine cost for each specific step and later aggregated to determine total cost for each sub-process. We compared costs of eight common clinical pathways for acute stone management, defining total cycle of care cost as the sum of all sub-processes that comprised each pathway. RESULTS: Cost per sub-process included $920 for emergency department (ED) care, $1665 for operative stent placement, $2368 for percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement, $106 for urology clinic consultation, $238 for preoperative center visit, $4057 for ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy (URS), $2923 for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, $169 for clinic stent removal, $197 for abdominal x-ray, and $166 for ultrasound. The lowest cost pathway ($1388) was for medical expulsive therapy, whereas the most expensive pathway ($8002) entailed a repeat ED visit prompting temporizing stent placement and interval URS. CONCLUSION: We found a high degree of cost variation between care pathways common to management of acute ureteral stone episodes. Reliable cost accounting data and an understanding of variability in clinical pathway costs can inform value-based care redesign as payors move away from pure fee-for-service reimbursement.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Cálculos Ureterales/economía , Cálculos Ureterales/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Costos y Análisis de Costo/métodos , Remoción de Dispositivos/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Humanos , Litotripsia por Láser/economía , Nefrostomía Percutánea/economía , Cuidados Preoperatorios/economía , Implantación de Prótesis/economía , Radiografía Abdominal/economía , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Stents/economía , Ultrasonografía/economía , Cálculos Ureterales/diagnóstico por imagen , Ureteroscopía/economía
19.
Am J Med ; 134(11): 1389-1395.e4, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34283952

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to examine the association between an academic medical center and free clinic referral partnership and subsequent hospital utilization and costs for uninsured patients discharged from the academic medical center's emergency department (ED) or inpatient hospital. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included 6014 uninsured patients age 18 and older who were discharged from the academic medical center's ED or inpatient hospital between July 2016 and June 2017 and were followed for 90 days in the organization's electronic medical record to identify the occurrence and cost of subsequent same-hospital ED visits and hospital admissions. The occurrence of any subsequent ED visits or hospital admissions and the cost of subsequent hospital care were compared by free clinic referral status after inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: Overall, 330 (5.5%) of uninsured patients were referred to the free clinic. Compared with patients referred to the free clinic, patients not referred had greater odds of any subsequent ED visits or hospital admissions within 90 days (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.7-2.0). For patients with any subsequent ED visits or hospital admissions, the mean cost of care for those who were not referred to the free clinic was 2.3 times higher (95% confidence interval: 2.0-2.7) compared to referred patients. CONCLUSION: An academic medical center-free clinic partnership for follow-up care after discharge from the ED or hospital admission is a promising approach for improving access to care for uninsured patients.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Pacientes no Asegurados , Atención Primaria de Salud , Derivación y Consulta , Adolescente , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
20.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 30(10): 106016, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34325273

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Transient ischemic attack (TIA) can be a warning sign of an impending stroke. The objective of our study is to assess the feasibility, safety, and cost savings of a comprehensive TIA protocol in the emergency room for low-risk TIA patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center cohort study performed at an academic comprehensive stroke center. We implemented an emergency department-based TIA protocol pathway for low-risk TIA patients (defined as ABCD2 score < 4 and without significant vessel stenosis) who were able to undergo vascular imaging and a brain MRI in the emergency room. Patients were set up with rapid outpatient follow-up in our stroke clinic and scheduled for an outpatient echocardiogram, if indicated. We compared this cohort to TIA patients admitted prior to the implementation of the TIA protocol who would have qualified. Outcomes of interest included length of stay, hospital cost, radiographic and echocardiogram findings, recurrent neurovascular events within 30 days, and final diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients were assessed (65 patients in the pre-pathway cohort, 73 in the expedited, post-TIA pathway implementation cohort). Average time from MRI order to MRI end was 6.4 h compared to 2.3 h in the pre- and post-pathway cohorts, respectively (p < 0.0001). The average length of stay for the pre-pathway group was 28.8 h in the pre-pathway cohort compared to 7.7 h in the post-pathway cohort (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in neuroimaging or echocardiographic findings. There were no differences in the 30 days re-presentation for stroke or TIA or mortality between the two groups. The direct cost per TIA admission was $2,944.50 compared to $1,610.50 for TIA patients triaged through the pathway at our institution. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and cost-savings of a comprehensive, emergency department-based TIA protocol. Further study is needed to confirm overall benefit of an expedited approach to TIA patient management and guide clinical practice recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Costos de Hospital , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/economía , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/terapia , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos Clínicos , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico por imagen , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/mortalidad , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triaje/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...